Mourinho

Out of line, or telling it like it is?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

"Google Beta User" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...


sometimes he should just keep quiet.

Google Beta User wrote:

Umm Memo to José: Avram did something you couldn't do: Beat Liverpool.

Every time he saw a Liverpool shirt he froze.

(All due respect to fans of LFC)

--
rwa2play, The Northern Lariat

"Google Beta User" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]...

*Look at ME please*

I think that sums it up.

rwa2play, The Northern Lariat wrote:

In the cause of accuracy, and for all those opposed to stupid statements,
maybe a look at Jose's record is needed. Liverpool v Chelsea in JM's
three seasons League and CL reads;

Liverpool P 12. W3. D3. L6 GF 5. GA 10.

One of those three wins was on penalties, and didn't the other come from
"the goal that wasn't ? All Pools 5 came in home games as they failed
to get any at the bridge. Seems unlikely that Jose had any great fears
about Pool over any other of the Prem top teams, despite Raffa claiming
the same ( a comment which, from memory, cost him a 1-4 home defeat).

Why would any manager fear a side which can only win one in four against
you, and then, only if at home?

Seems silly to me.

LC

lescor wrote:

My apologies. What I meant to say was unlike Mourinho, Grant actually
*beat* Liverpool in the Champions League.

Seems like every time José lost to Liverpool in the CL, he moaned about
everything going against him.
--
rwa2play, The Northern Lariat

Before God we are all equally wise -- and equally foolish. -- Albert
Einstein

On Sat, 24 May 2008 14:30:16 -0700 (PDT), Google Beta User
<[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote:


I agree with Mourinho and according to some sources, Grant may have
been one of the main reasons that later led Mourinho to leave Chelsea.
Grant's visits to Abramovich yacht before he went to Portsmouth, are
questionable. Many suspect that the conversations he had with the
Chelsea's owner about Mourinho may have persuaded the russian to get
rid of the special one. If that's true then Grant is the one who
indirectly set off the whole process that ended with Mourinho leaving
the club. Coincidence or not the undermining of Mourinho's work at
Chelsea by the owner and the board, started when Grant and Abramovich
became good friends. If Grant had a hand on derailing the portuguese
work, then he caused great damage to Chelsea and has no right to talk
about his so called "success". Mourinho on the other hand would have
all the right to underline the fact that some Chesea's disappointments
in the third season and the beginning of the fourth, was the result of
being undermined left and right by a few people.

Geonet

Geonet
---------------------------------------------------------
Replace second geonet by iinet to reply

lescor wrote:
"the goal that wasn't". It shouldn't be brought up as a questionable
result. The fact remains Liverpool won.

"Whatever" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:g7pko3$cra$1$[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].uk...
Maybe the poster meant, JM couldn't beat LFC where it counted. Sure lg games
all count as he needs points, though each title he won he would of done so
without the points he gained from the LFC fixtures.

Whatever wrote:

They sure did, and it was one of the few times that Benitez got the better
of Mourinho. So Jose hardly froze at the sight of Liverpool. In fact, I
think one of Liverpool's heaviest home League defeats in years was against
Chelsea at Anfield!