| Criticism of Walter Smith, is it justified ?
I cannot believe the amount of criticism being levelled at Walter. All this nonsense about 'tactics'. He played Rangers to their strengths, with a pool of somewhat limited players, with exceptions of course. He took Sellick to the last game of the season for the SPL, won both domestic cups and got to a European final. Look at the players and the 'tactics' Walter used the first time around. Laudrup and Gazza. McCoist and Hateley. Trevor Steven and Derk Ferguson, (before he went off the rails). They totally dominated Scottish Football for almost a decade. And they played some great football. This time around, Walter has had little or no money to spend, yet has worked wonders. End of the day, I could not care less about tactics. First and foremost, I want to see Rangers being successful. Every time I read 'anti-football', I immediately think, 'sour grapes'.
I don't care if Sellick play attacking or otherwise, so why the hysteria about Rangers tactics ?
CFC, why were Rangers a far superior side ? Because Walter Smith made them that way !
Saoirse, I was very dissapointed in the line-up for the Zenit match, before a ball was kicked. He should have went for it. I value your opinion. To criticise his tactics in the UEFA final is justified. My point was people questioned his tactics on the whole. That I do not find fair.
THAS, you are boring in the extreme. You and your kind are 'Scotland's shame'. Who do you think you are appealing to or pleasing by dropping that nonsensical, in the extreme, comment in at every possible oppurtunity ?
Are you cpabale of rational thought ?
No, because you are a bigot. Wait for your kind to come on, (ABBO, Rangersbubbleburst, Ballieston Boy, Rickybhoy, et al), to find someone on the same wavelength.
You are BORING.
 |